Back to Impact Studies

JusAsk AI Legal Software

Client Overview

The Law Society of Singapore (LSS or LawSoc) is the statutory body established in 1967 under the Legal Profession Act to represent, regulate, and support all lawyers in Singapore. Its primary functions include maintaining professional standards among lawyers, assisting in their professional development, protecting the public in matters related to the law, and investigating complaints against lawyers. The LSS is also responsible for promoting the interests of the legal profession and enhancing the public's access to justice.

With over 7,000 members, the LSS faced significant challenges in efficiently addressing legal inquiries, often taking several days for departments to respond to individual questions. A major portion of the data processed by LSS departments is strictly confidential. REPCONN is the only non-Singaporean entity in the world that has been entrusted with access to this data.

Challenge

LawSoc needed a solution to:

Provide immediate, accurate responses to member inquiries across multiple platforms

Reduce response time from days to seconds

Handle sensitive legal information securely while ensuring data privacy compliance

Integrate seamlessly with their existing website and offer mobile access

Scale to support their growing membership base

Solution: JusAsk

A comprehensive AI-powered legal system deployed across three platforms:

Web-based AI software embedded in LawSoc's WordPress website

iOS native application built with Swift

Android native application built with Kotlin

JusAsk Web Interface

Data Protection Architecture

Building AI legal software for a regulatory body required implementing strict data protection measures:

Tiered Data Classification

Public tier:

General legal resources, FAQ content

Member-restricted tier:

Professional development materials, confidential member communications

Highly confidential tier:

AML investigation files, financial data (restricted to LawSoc + Singapore government only)

Privacy by Design Implementation

Data minimization

Only essential data fields ingested for AI training

Purpose limitation

Documented specific purposes for each data category

Storage limitation

90-day retention for conversation logs, automated purging workflows

Pseudonymization

Member names and case identifiers masked before AI model access

Access Control Framework

Role-based access controls (RBAC) enforced at API level

Multi-factor authentication for administrative functions

Audit logging of all data access with anomaly detection

Segregated storage for different sensitivity tiers

Compliance Framework: Singapore's PDPA & GDPR Alignment

Singapore's Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) follows GDPR principles:

Consent management and purpose specification (GDPR Art. 6, 13)

Data subject rights workflows: access, correction, deletion (GDPR Art. 15-17)

Breach notification procedures meeting 72-hour requirements (GDPR Art. 33)

Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) methodology (GDPR Art. 35)

iOS Application

iOS App

Key Features

Multi-platform availability

Available on Web, iOS, and Android platforms for seamless access across all devices

Intelligent response system

Achieves 80-90% accuracy rate with continuous learning and improvement

Rapid response times

Average response time of 8-10 seconds, down from several days

Enterprise-grade security

AES-256 encryption with Singapore-based AWS hosting for maximum data protection

Real-time analytics

Comprehensive dashboard for monitoring usage patterns, system performance and compliance

Member-focused design

Intuitive interface designed specifically for legal professionals and their workflows

Implementation Process

1

Phase 1: Audit, Discovery & Data Governance (Week 1-4)

Compliance audit and risk assessment under PDPA and GDPR

Comprehensive analysis of data sources: WordPress content, Microsoft 365 systems, Members Library, Ethics resources

Data classification into sensitivity tiers: public, member-restricted, highly confidential (AML/financial data)

Security requirements documentation for confidential data accessible only to LSS and REPCONN

Multi-tier access control architecture design

Legal basis documentation for each data processing category

Data lineage mapping and pseudonymization protocols

2

Phase 2: Development & Training (Week 5-9)

Core AI system implementation powered by Gemini 2.0

Secure data ingestion pipeline with encryption at every stage

Advanced data masking: PII pseudonymization, financial identifier redaction, case reference anonymization

Vector database implementation with access enforcement at query level

Multi-platform development: Web (React/TypeScript), iOS (Swift), Android (Kotlin)

AES-256 encryption implementation (data at rest and in transit)

Authentication framework: MFA, role-based access controls (RBAC)

AWS Singapore region deployment for data residency compliance

3

Phase 3: Testing, Fine-Tuning & Deployment (Week 10-12)

AI model accuracy optimization and bias detection testing

Security penetration testing by independent auditors

User acceptance testing with LawSoc staff across all platforms

Response time optimization (achieved 7.53s average)

Phased rollout: internal staff → limited member beta → full production launch

Real-time monitoring dashboard activation

Incident response procedures validation

Member training materials and onboarding documentation

4

Phase 4: Assessment & Continuous Improvement (Ongoing)

Post-deployment validation: 852 conversations in first 30 days, 80-90% accuracy rate achieved

Weekly accuracy reviews with LawSoc legal team and IT department

Monthly model retraining with new legal updates and member feedback

Quarterly security audits and compliance reviews

Continuous monitoring of data access patterns for anomaly detection

User satisfaction surveys and feature enhancement planning

AI System Governance & Transparency

Explainability Mechanisms

Source attribution

Every AI response cites specific documents used

Confidence scoring

System displays certainty level for each answer

Escalation pathways

Members can request human review of AI advice

Decision logging

All AI interactions recorded for audit purposes

Human Oversight

LawSoc legal staff review flagged responses before delivery

Weekly accuracy audits by subject matter experts

Feedback loops for continuous model improvement

Manual override capability for sensitive queries

Documentation & Accountability

Technical documentation maintained per EU AI Act Annex IV standards

Model cards documenting training data, limitations, and intended use

Risk assessment updated quarterly as system evolves

Clear accountability: LawSoc retains ultimate responsibility for AI outputs

EU AI Act Alignment

Implementation addresses key regulatory requirements:

Article 13

Transparency obligations for high-risk AI systems

Article 14

Human oversight requirements

Article 17

Quality management system documentation

Article 72

Post-market monitoring obligations

Handling Confidential Financial & AML Data

The system processes highly sensitive financial information including:

Member practice revenue and financial performance data

Client account transaction records and trust accounting information

Anti-money laundering (AML) investigation files accessible only to LawSoc compliance officers and Singapore government authorities

Disciplinary proceeding financial evidence

Encryption at Every Layer

AES-256 encryption for data at rest (database, file storage)

TLS 1.3 for data in transit (API communications, mobile apps)

Field-level encryption for especially sensitive data (AML files, financial identifiers)

Access Restrictions

AML data:

Limited to 3 authorized LawSoc personnel + designated government entities

Financial records:

Accessible only to authenticated members viewing their own data

All access logged with user ID, timestamp, data accessed, and purpose

Automated Redaction

Financial identifiers (account numbers, amounts) automatically redacted from AI responses

Member names replaced with pseudonyms in training datasets

Case references anonymized to prevent cross-referencing

Regulatory Reporting Capability

Audit trails maintained for regulatory inspection

Automated generation of access reports for government oversight

Incident response procedures documented and tested

Results & Impact

852

Total Conversations

In first 30 days

7.53s

Average Response Time

Down from several days

80-90%

Accuracy Rate

With continuous improvement

Compliance & Security Outcomes

Zero data breaches during 12+ months of operation

100% compliance with PDPA validated by LawSoc's legal team

Successful government audit of AML data access controls

Attorney-client privilege maintained through technical safeguards

Data subject rights requests fulfilled within 30-day statutory deadline

Regulatory Context

Implementation demonstrates capabilities applicable across regulated industries

Legal Sector Requirements

PDPA compliance

AML data security

Professional privilege protection

Government oversight access

Multi-tier data classification

Audit trail maintenance

Financial Sector Parallels

GDPR/ePrivacy Directive

PSD2/AMLD customer data protection

Banking secrecy obligations

DORA/MiFID II regulatory reporting

GDPR data segmentation

EU AI Act Article 12 record-keeping

Applicable Use Cases

AI customer service systems under GDPR Article 22

Fraud detection algorithms under AMLD

Algorithmic trading platforms under MiFID II

Credit scoring systems under EU AI Act high-risk category

Technology Stack

Core Technologies

AI Model: Gemini 2.0

Backend: Node.js

Web Interface: React

Mobile: Swift & Kotlin

Infrastructure

AWS Singapore Region

Vector database

AES-256 encryption

WAF & MFA

Development Tools

Visual Studio Code

GitLab

Azure DevOps

BlackBox

Android Application

Android App
JusAsk Mobile Interface

Web Application

Confidentiality Notice

Due to the sensitive nature of legal data processing and proprietary regulatory information, Space&Miller LLC DBA REPCONN has signed a Non-Disclosure Agreement with The Law Society of Singapore.

The information presented in this case study has been carefully reviewed and approved for public disclosure. For inquiries about additional technical details, implementation specifics, or resources that cannot be publicly discussed, please contact jeremy@repconn.com to discuss what can and cannot be shared under the terms of our agreement.