DORA Implementation

Digital operational resilience for financial entities. ICT risk management frameworks, incident response automation, third-party oversight, and penetration testing protocols.

Regulations Covered

DORA, NIS2, CJEU case law

Status

Fully Applicable Since January 17, 2025

Why DORA Matters

Extraterritorial Reach

DORA applies to any ICT third-party provider whose services are used by EU financial entities, regardless of where the provider is located. US, Asian, and Middle Eastern technology companies serving EU financial institutions must comply with DORA oversight requirements.

US Technology Companies

American cloud providers, software vendors, and fintech platforms serving EU banks, insurers, or payment institutions fall under DORA. Critical providers face direct ESA oversight regardless of US headquarters.

Asia-Pacific Financial Services

Singapore, Hong Kong, and Australian financial institutions expanding to Europe need DORA-compliant ICT risk management. Asian fintech companies serving EU customers must implement incident reporting and resilience testing.

Middle East Markets

UAE and Saudi Arabian financial institutions entering European markets need comprehensive DORA compliance infrastructure. Middle Eastern crypto-asset service providers under MiCA must implement DORA requirements.

Unprecedented Penalties

DORA introduces severe penalties for non-compliance, with national competent authorities empowered to impose administrative fines and other enforcement measures.

€10M

Maximum administrative fine for financial entities, or 5% of total annual worldwide turnover in the preceding business year, whichever is higher.

€5M

Maximum fine for natural persons responsible for non-compliance, or 1% of total annual worldwide turnover of the financial entity.

Additional Measures

Competent authorities may issue public warnings, suspend services, or remove management members for serious breaches of DORA requirements.

Implementation Timeline

DORA became fully applicable on January 17, 2025, with ongoing oversight and enforcement activities.

December 14, 2022

DORA Adoption

The European Parliament and Council adopted Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 on digital operational resilience for the financial sector.

January 16, 2023

Entry into Force

DORA entered into force, beginning the transition period for financial entities to prepare for compliance.

January 17, 2025

Full Application

DORA became fully applicable across the EU. All financial entities must comply with ICT risk management, incident reporting, resilience testing, third-party oversight, and information sharing requirements.

Ongoing

Oversight & Enforcement

European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) designate critical ICT third-party providers and conduct oversight activities. National competent authorities supervise financial entities' compliance.

The Five Pillars of DORA

DORA establishes five core requirements for digital operational resilience in the financial sector

ICT Risk Management

Financial entities must implement comprehensive ICT risk management frameworks covering governance, policies, procedures, and controls. We help you establish robust risk identification, assessment, and mitigation strategies for all critical ICT systems and third-party dependencies.

Key Requirements

  • ICT risk management framework with clear governance structures
  • Policies and procedures for ICT risk identification and assessment
  • Business continuity and disaster recovery plans
  • ICT asset inventory and classification systems

ICT-Related Incident Management

Financial entities must detect, manage, and report significant ICT-related incidents to competent authorities. We provide automated incident detection, classification, and reporting systems that meet DORA's strict notification timelines.

Key Requirements

  • Incident detection and monitoring systems
  • Classification criteria for major ICT-related incidents
  • Reporting to competent authorities within required timeframes
  • Root cause analysis and lessons learned processes

Digital Operational Resilience Testing

Financial entities must conduct regular testing of ICT systems, including advanced testing for critical entities. We design and execute comprehensive testing programs including vulnerability assessments, scenario-based testing, and threat-led penetration testing (TLPT).

Key Requirements

  • Annual vulnerability assessments and scans
  • Scenario-based testing of business continuity plans
  • Threat-led penetration testing (TLPT) for critical entities
  • Testing of backup and recovery procedures

ICT Third-Party Risk Management

Financial entities must manage risks arising from ICT third-party service providers through comprehensive oversight and contractual arrangements. We provide automated vendor risk assessments, contract review frameworks, and continuous monitoring of critical service providers.

Key Requirements

  • Register of all ICT third-party service providers
  • Risk assessments for each third-party provider
  • Contractual arrangements with key provisions
  • Exit strategies and transition plans

Information Sharing

Financial entities may exchange cyber threat information and intelligence with other entities and authorities. We implement secure information sharing mechanisms and integrate with relevant platforms and regulatory reporting systems.

Key Requirements

  • Arrangements for sharing cyber threat information
  • Participation in information sharing platforms
  • Protection of confidential information
  • Coordination with competent authorities

DORA Oversight Framework

The EU establishes a comprehensive oversight framework for critical ICT third-party providers serving the financial sector

LEAD OVERSEERS

European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs)

The European Banking Authority (EBA), European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA), and European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) jointly oversee critical ICT third-party providers (CTPPs). The ESAs designate providers as critical and conduct oversight activities through Joint Examination Teams.

Key Responsibilities

  • Designate ICT third-party providers as critical based on systemic importance
  • Conduct risk assessments and oversight examinations of CTPPs
  • Issue recommendations to CTPPs to address identified risks
  • Coordinate oversight activities across the EU through the Oversight Forum

SUPERVISORS

National Competent Authorities

National competent authorities in each EU Member State supervise financial entities' compliance with DORA requirements. They receive incident reports, conduct inspections, and enforce compliance through administrative measures and penalties.

Key Responsibilities

  • Supervise financial entities' ICT risk management frameworks
  • Receive and assess major ICT-related incident reports
  • Conduct on-site inspections and off-site monitoring
  • Impose administrative penalties for non-compliance

OVERSIGHT EXECUTION

Joint Examination Teams (JETs)

Joint Examination Teams assist the ESAs in conducting oversight activities for each designated CTPP. JETs are composed of staff from the ESAs and relevant national competent authorities, working under the coordination of a designated ESA staff member.

Key Responsibilities

  • Execute oversight examinations of assigned CTPPs
  • Assess ICT risk management and security measures
  • Prepare recommendations for the ESAs to issue to CTPPs
  • Monitor implementation of recommendations

DORA and NIS2 Intersection

Understanding how DORA and the NIS2 Directive intersect for financial institutions

NIS2 Directive Overview

The NIS2 Directive (Directive 2022/2555) establishes a unified legal framework to uphold cybersecurity in 18 critical sectors across the EU, including finance. NIS2 replaced its predecessor (NIS1) and raises the EU common level of ambition on cybersecurity through wider scope, clearer rules, and stronger supervision tools. Member States had until October 17, 2024 to transpose NIS2 into national law.

NIS2 requires medium-sized and large entities in critical sectors to take appropriate cybersecurity risk management measures and notify relevant national authorities of significant incidents. The directive introduces accountability of top management for non-compliance, bringing cybersecurity to the attention of the boardroom.

Scope

DORA

Financial entities and critical ICT third-party providers serving them

NIS2

Essential and important entities across 18 critical sectors including finance, energy, transport, healthcare, and digital infrastructure

How We Help

Financial institutions may fall under both DORA (for operational resilience) and NIS2 (for cybersecurity). We help you establish unified compliance frameworks that satisfy both regulations.

Focus

DORA

Digital operational resilience including ICT risk management, incident response, resilience testing, and third-party oversight

NIS2

Cybersecurity risk management, incident reporting, supply chain security, and vulnerability management

How We Help

Both regulations require robust ICT/cybersecurity risk management and incident reporting. We help you integrate these requirements into a single governance framework to avoid duplication.

Incident Reporting

DORA

Major ICT-related incidents must be reported to financial regulators (national competent authorities)

NIS2

Significant cybersecurity incidents must be reported to national cybersecurity authorities (CSIRTs)

How We Help

Financial institutions may need to report the same incident to both financial regulators and cybersecurity authorities. We provide automated reporting systems that route incidents to the appropriate authorities based on classification criteria.

Third-Party Risk

DORA

Comprehensive oversight of ICT third-party providers with specific focus on critical providers designated by ESAs

NIS2

Supply chain security requirements including security assessments of suppliers and service providers

How We Help

Both regulations require vendor risk management. We help you establish unified third-party risk assessment frameworks that satisfy both DORA's contractual requirements and NIS2's supply chain security obligations.

Financial Services Use Cases

DORA applies to 20 different types of financial entities across the EU

Core Financial Entities

Banks & Credit Institutions

Banks must implement comprehensive ICT risk management covering all digital banking services, payment systems, and core banking infrastructure. This includes mobile banking apps, online banking platforms, ATM networks, and payment processing systems.

Implementation Challenges

Banks face complex ICT ecosystems with numerous third-party dependencies including cloud providers, payment processors, and core banking system vendors. We help you establish robust third-party oversight, conduct regular resilience testing, and implement automated incident response systems that meet DORA's strict requirements.

Core Financial Entities

Insurance & Reinsurance Companies

Insurance companies must ensure operational resilience of policy administration systems, claims processing platforms, and customer portals. This includes underwriting systems, actuarial modeling tools, and distribution channels.

Implementation Challenges

Insurance companies rely heavily on legacy systems and third-party administrators for critical functions. We help you modernize ICT risk management frameworks, establish business continuity plans for critical systems, and implement incident reporting workflows that comply with DORA and national insurance regulations.

Core Financial Entities

Payment & E-Money Institutions

Payment service providers must ensure continuous availability and security of payment processing systems, including card networks, mobile payment apps, and digital wallets. This includes real-time payment systems and cross-border payment infrastructure.

Implementation Challenges

Payment institutions operate in real-time environments where downtime directly impacts customers and merchants. We help you implement high-availability architectures, conduct scenario-based resilience testing, and establish rapid incident response procedures that minimize service disruption while meeting DORA reporting obligations.

Emerging Financial Entities

Crypto-Asset Service Providers

Crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) under MiCA must implement DORA-compliant ICT risk management for trading platforms, custody solutions, and blockchain infrastructure. This includes hot and cold wallet systems, exchange platforms, and DeFi protocols.

Implementation Challenges

CASPs face unique challenges including blockchain-specific risks, smart contract vulnerabilities, and 24/7 global operations. We help you establish ICT governance frameworks tailored to crypto operations, implement continuous monitoring for blockchain infrastructure, and develop incident response procedures for both traditional ICT incidents and blockchain-specific events.

DORA for AI/ML Systems

How DORA affects financial institutions deploying artificial intelligence and machine learning systems

AI/ML-Specific Risks

AI and ML systems introduce unique operational risks that DORA specifically targets. Financial institutions must integrate AI/ML systems into their ICT risk management frameworks and ensure these systems meet digital operational resilience requirements.

Model Reliability & Explainability

AI models must be transparent, auditable, and predictable, especially for decision-making in financial services. We help you implement model governance frameworks that document model logic, training data, and decision processes.

Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities

ML models can be exploited through adversarial attacks, data poisoning, or model inversion. We implement resilience testing specifically for AI systems and establish incident management procedures for AI-related security events.

Data Integrity & GDPR Alignment

AI systems rely on sensitive financial data, so compliance must integrate both DORA operational resilience requirements and GDPR data protection obligations. We establish unified frameworks that satisfy both regulations.

Global Implications

DORA affects financial institutions worldwide that deploy AI/ML systems for EU operations or serve EU clients.

EU-Based Financial Institutions

Direct compliance requirement. All AI/ML systems must be integrated into the ICT risk management framework with operational resilience testing, incident detection, and response planning.

Non-EU Institutions Serving EU Clients

Indirect applicability. US, Asian, and Middle Eastern firms providing AI/ML services to EU financial institutions face contractual and regulatory pressure to meet DORA standards. EU clients will require compliance evidence.

AI/ML Vendors & Cloud Providers

Technology companies providing AI/ML platforms, cloud infrastructure, or machine learning services to EU financial entities may be designated as critical ICT third-party providers, subjecting them to direct ESA oversight.

Our DORA Compliance Framework

Comprehensive digital operational resilience solutions for financial entities

ICT Risk Management Framework

We establish comprehensive ICT risk management frameworks aligned with DORA Article 6 requirements. Our system provides automated risk identification across your entire ICT infrastructure, including cloud services, on-premises systems, and third-party dependencies. We implement governance structures with clear roles and responsibilities, develop risk assessment methodologies tailored to financial services, and create living documentation that updates with infrastructure changes.

Automated Incident Response

We build automated incident detection and response systems that meet DORA's strict notification timelines. Our system continuously monitors ICT systems for anomalies, automatically classifies incidents based on DORA criteria, and generates regulatory reports for competent authorities. We implement escalation workflows with clear responsibilities, establish root cause analysis procedures, and maintain comprehensive incident logs for regulatory inspections.

Digital Resilience Testing

We design and execute comprehensive testing programs that satisfy DORA Article 24-26 requirements. Our approach includes annual vulnerability assessments using industry-standard tools, scenario-based testing of business continuity plans, and threat-led penetration testing (TLPT) for critical entities. We provide detailed testing reports with remediation roadmaps, track remediation progress, and maintain testing documentation for regulatory review.

Third-Party Oversight System

We provide automated third-party risk management systems that maintain registers of all ICT service providers, conduct continuous risk assessments, and monitor contractual compliance. Our system tracks key contractual provisions required by DORA, monitors service level agreements in real-time, and maintains exit strategies for critical providers. We generate oversight reports for management and regulators, ensuring full transparency of third-party dependencies.

Information Sharing Integration

We implement secure information sharing mechanisms that enable participation in cyber threat intelligence platforms. Our system integrates with relevant information sharing arrangements, protects confidential information through encryption and access controls, and coordinates with competent authorities on emerging threats. We provide dashboards showing threat landscape relevant to your institution and automated alerts for critical threats.

Continuous Compliance Monitoring

We provide real-time compliance dashboards that show DORA compliance status across all five pillars. Our system generates automated compliance reports for management and boards, tracks regulatory developments and updates requirements accordingly, and maintains audit trails for all compliance activities. We provide early warning systems for potential compliance gaps and remediation tracking to ensure timely resolution.

Ready to Achieve DORA Compliance?

Start with a comprehensive ICT risk assessment and gap analysis

Apply for Partnership